On the Yahoo! front page:
Going with the original meaning of “preposterous” (at least, its etymology), a “preposterous dress” would have to be one that was on backward. (Or is that “backwards”? I’ll check with the Yahoo! editors on that one.)
Lemme know what they say.
I don’t wee what is so redikulis about that spelling. Laura, sometimes your criticisms are simply asburd.
I am a nitpicker. I pick nits.
Gross. But someone has to do it.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 398 other followers