Don’t expect a man to come to the rescue of his wife if she should fall ill in a peat bog:
Thanks to Yahoo! Shine for the Laugh o’ the Day.
Don’t expect a man to come to the rescue of his wife if she should fall ill in a peat bog:
Thanks to Yahoo! Shine for the Laugh o’ the Day.
When he’s not lobbing insults at “American Idol” contestants, Simon Cowell spends his time trying to influence legislators. No, no, that can’t be right. It doesn’t make sense, but it does appear in the Yahoo! Music blog “Reality Rocks,” so there must be some truth to it:
Was there a ringer in “American Idol”? Someone who was put there by the producers to affect the outcome of the voting?
And was the ringer put through the wringer like the other contestants?
Some people have an ear for language and are natural writers. And others don’t and aren’t. They lack the sensitivity to the connotation of words. They may be good interviewers or have interesting or controversial opinions, which might make them valuable as writers. But they need the support of a good (and I mean a really good) editor. Sometimes the kindest thing to do is to recommend that in the absence of an editor, the writer might consider another line of work.
How do you know it’s time to step away from your keyboard? When you can’t spot egregious typos like this one in an article by a Yahoo! Shine writer:
If, in the same article, you repeat words:
And if you have no ear for common expressions and clichés and can’t choose the correct word when you try to use one:
Honey, if you have a problem with verb tense you might re-examine your career choice, especially if it’s not the first time you’ve used the present tense when the past tense is required:
I was instantly stuck on this sentence and struck by the possibility that you don’t know the difference between stuck and struck:
No excuse is possible here :
You write about the fashion industry. You work for an Internet search giant. You can find the correct spelling of Giuseppe Zanotti rather quickly. Maybe what you can’t find is a reason to bother spelling it correctly.
If you make numerous grammatical and spelling mistakes, you don’t get the editorial support your writing requires, and you can’t seem to self-edit, you should consider the possibility that you work for a company that doesn’t value quality writing and its readers’ intelligence. And you might consider that you’ve found the perfect gig.
Someone at Yahoo! Music needs to get in touch with his or her inner proofreader:
Every once in a while, even the best writers make a careless mistake. But if the number and severity of the errors are like those in this Yahoo! Shine blog, it may be time for the writer to take a little vacation or at least step away from the keyboard for a day or two:

Usually the wee hours of a day occur in the morning, although I suppose 6 PM might be considered a wee hour of the night. The correct expression is “every once in a while.” There’s an extra word in that sentence and an extraneous hyphen in weeklong.
Maybe the writer meant to put the indefinite article a in this sentence:
Hiking may be a trial for some people, even on a local trail:
I don’t know anything about the writer’s personal life, but it’s possible she’s suffering from new-parent stress:
That might explain this misplaced period (it belongs before the closing quotation mark) and the use of the possessive pronoun its instead of the correct contraction it’s:
She just may need to stop at a local eatery for a treat. A little sugar rush might be just what she requires.
This looks like a grammatically correct, error-free statement:
The problem? The author lists only four ideas, not five.
Whew. I think I’m the one who needs a vacation. Or maybe just a nap.
Did Michael Sheen actually wear heels in the movie “Frost/Nixon”? Is that what this caption from Yahoo! Movies means?
Oh, no! Now I get it. It’s just a messed-up cliché! It comes on the heels of another word misstep by the writer.
Maybe the only thing worse than a cliché is getting a cliché wrong. The writer on Yahoo! TV does that and more:
Let’s just be generous and call “Clark’s” and “memory land” typos, shall we?
The management over at Yahoo! Shine should have kept tabs on the creator of this excerpt:
This is either a simple typo or the mangled expression of a woefully ignorant writer.
If you’re a professional writer, you should be familiar with English and its cliches and figures of speech. If you’re the writer of this excerpt from Yahoo! Shine, you need to work with a competent editor or you can kiss your career goodbye: