Written by a so-called professional?

Even so-called professional writers make grammatical, punctuation, and spelling mistakes — especially if they work for Yahoo!. Take this example from Yahoo! News‘ “The Sideshow,” where the writer believes that quotation marks belong after the expression “so-called”:

ped 1

They don’t. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, “Quotation marks are not used to set off descriptions that follow expressions such as so-called and self-styled, which themselves relieve the writer of responsibility for the attribution: his so-called foolproof method (not ‘foolproof method’).

That’s a common mistake. On Yahoo!, there are a lot of common mistakes, like failing to match a pronoun with its antecedent (the word it refers to). And failing to hyphenate modern-day when it’s used as an adjective, misspelling Flintstones, and best of all using peddles instead of pedals:

ped 2

This is more akin to a careless error:

ped 3

And any decent spell-checker would have flagged Minnealpolis as a misspelling:

ped 4

But for Yahoo!’s so-called journalists, spell-checking is optional. Heck, it’s not just optional, it’s nonexistent.

Just to be sure we understand that Jeff Stone is a Republican state representative, the writer tells us in two slightly different ways, each containing its own errors:

ped 5

If you think I’m the only person who is appalled by this professional writer’s ignorance, you’d be wrong. Here’s one comment left by a reader:

“using peddles underneath their seats”
“PEDDLES”???? Jeezuz Joe Bob. My 6-year-old can write better than this. Apparently they’re trying to solve the unemployment problem by giving illiterate idiots jobs writing “news” articles. Sheesh.

Just move it to the left

There’s nothing wrong with this caption on Yahoo! Shine that moving the apostrophe to the left wouldn’t fix:

60s shine hp

The apostrophe should be used to show the omission of digits (in this case, 19), and not to form the plural of a decade: ’60s is correct.

One of them is probably right

What do you do when you’re unsure of the use of the hyphen? Should you hyphenate two words or leave them open? Just do what the editors at the Yahoo! front page do:

fp drug test

You’re sure to be right — once.

What kind of eggs do turtles poach?

Oh, dopey me. I thought that poachers were stealing turtle eggs in Costa Rica. But according to Yahoo! News it’s the turtles that are doing the poaching:

news turtle egg

This is the news?

It’s not news to readers of  Yahoo! News that the writers and editors frequently make mistakes, including these that appeared at the same time on the same page:

news stars wars

That is supposed to be “Star Wars,” of course. And the Barbie Dreamhouse is trademarked:

news dreamhouse

And so is Ping-Pong:

news ping pong

The common noun for the sport is “table tennis.”

Peekaboo boo-boo part two

What dictionary did the writer for the Yahoo! front page use to check the spelling of this?

fp peek-a-boo 2

According to the dictionary you’ll find on Yahoo! (the American Heritage Dictionary), there’s no hyphens in peekaboo. According to the folks at yahoo.com, there are two of them.

It’s like a Tom-Hanks movie

What was the writer for yahoo.com thinking?

fp triple crown hy

Putting a hyphen in Triple Crown (even when it’s used to modify a noun) is like hyphenating a name. You wouldn’t write “Tom-Hanks movie” or “Barack-Obama speech,” would you? Oh, I guess if you’re a Yahoo! staffer you probably would.

Something’s afoot and it’s not good

It’s not the worst typo a writer can make, but it’s an easy one to spot if you’re writing about Ray Halbritter:

reds 1

Maybe the writer needs some assistance in the proofreading department:

reds 2

And editor who knows that either is singular and it’s is the contraction for it has would certainly help:

reds 3

But something is afoot at Yahoo! Sports‘ “Prep Rally”: There’s no proofreader or editor at hand.

What was the name of that movie?

It’s one of the simplest rules of punctuation, and yet one of the most frequently ignored by the writers and editors at Yahoo!. This time the offense appears on the Yahoo! front page, where millions of people can point and laugh:

fp bling ring

The rule is simple: A question mark goes before a closing quotation mark if it is part of the quoted matter. In this case, it’s not. The title of the movie is not “Bling Ring?” The entire phrase is the question: Real-life ‘Bling Ring’?

Where was your head when you wrote that?

I don’t want to even think about where the writer’s head was when he wrote this headline for Yahoo! Sports‘ “Big League Stew”:

heads

The expression is “head over heels” and it means “to roll, as in a somersault.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 454 other followers

%d bloggers like this: