If only it were true. If only an editor had read this headline on Yahoo! Shine before it was published it might have included an apostrophe (for teens’) and the correct verb:
Just what is the writers’ age factor (besides being an extremely awkward phrase)? Does a writer’s age have an influence on the quality of his or her writing? There’s lots of anecdotal evidence that those who graduated from high school in the last twenty years don’t have the same writing skills as their parents. Is the writer for the Yahoo! front page — who forgot about a little apostrophe — one of those recent high school grads?
If you’re unsure how to use an apostrophe, just don’t use it. If you’re wrong, you’ll look as ill-educated as the folks at Yahoo!.
You wouldn’t want to make the mistake of putting the apostrophe in the wrong place (as it is here on yahoo.com), would you?
If you don’t know that the apostrophe goes first (in ’80s) to show the omission of the 19, then don’t use one.
You’ll just embarrass yourself if you think you can form the plural of a noun with an apostrophe like this gaffe from Yahoo! News:
and this one from Yahoo! Movies:
And I would be embarrassed for you if you used an apostrophe in a verb that isn’t a contraction:
Unsure about your punctuation abilities? Get some help. Just don’t ask anyone who works for Yahoo! for advice.
When I read this opening paragraph from Yahoo! Shine, I could almost see the writer doing “air quotes” as she alleges (with a wink) that Jared Leto won a Best Supporting Actor Oscar:
It’s odd that the writer would choose to put the Oscar category in quotation marks (they don’t belong there) and not the movie title (they belong there). Also odd is the fact that she got the name of the film wrong (it’s not Buyer’s, but Buyers) and mangled Constance Leto’s first name.
That’s only the first sentence and the article already has three errors. Not bad for Yahoo!.
It’s hard not to cringe when you read something as poorly written as this article on Yahoo! Shine. From the typos and the writer’s imaginative spelling of Rutgers, it has a lot to offer the discerning reader:
She writes about an author whose most recent book is “The Essentials of Business Etiquette: How to Greet, Eat, and Tweet…” using who’s (which means “who is” or “who has”) and getting the title wrong:
I’d tell the writer to learn to proofread, or if you don’t have time, get someone to do it for you. It would be helpful to you for your career:
It’s time she learn the difference between a possessive pronoun (like its) and a contraction (like it’s):
If she learned to proofread, she could send an email and post something on a social media site without typos and missing words:
She might also learn to check her articles after they’ve been published to ensure she hasn’t omitted vital information, like the text of a tweet:
When quoting someone, the folks at Yahoo! News’ “Trending Now” never fail to make the speaker look like an idiot by misspelling something. This time the writers seem to feel that ya’ll (which would be slang for “you will”) adequately expresses the speakers comments here:
The correct spelling for that Southern regionalism is y’all, a shortened form of “you all.”
Others who read that article noticed the misspelling, too, and commented:
Come on people! It’s “y’all”!
It’s “y’all”, not “ya’ll”. And don’t waste your time telling me any different.
If you don’t think readers don’t notice your mistakes, y’all are kidding yourself.
An apostrophe has two main uses: To form a possessive (as in “the editor’s mistake”) and to indicate the omission of a letter or number (as in “she doesn’t know where it goes”). So, in this headline on Yahoo! Shine let’s assume the apostrophe here is to indicate the omission of a letter:
What would that letter be? P? S? Probably not. What’s more likely is that the writer has no idea how to use an apostrophe and meant ol’ — which is often used to show a clipped pronunciation of old.