Quick! Hit the Delete key

If this Yahoo! press release hit my in-box, I wouldn’t be able to hit the Delete key fast enough:



It’s Mitchell Lichtenstein

Not Mitchell Litchenstein, as alleged by the writer of this caption from Yahoo! Movies:


Rhona Mitra missing something

And it’s a letter in this photo caption from Yahoo! Movies:


Readers: How long has it been since you read a headline with a missing word?

Dropping a word from a headline is not going to go unnoticed, even in an exceptionally bloated headline like this one from Yahoo! Shine:


Reporting on fashion weak

Reporting on New York Fashion Week can lead to some tragic mistakes.  Yahoo! Shine tries again with a report of celebs in the audience of some of the biggest shows, but not without some all-new errors, including this typo:


Emile Hirsch was spotted at the William Rast show. But I don’t know who was sitting with Jessica Biel:


And three celebs appeared at the Narciso Rodriguez something-or-other:


I can’t tell if a word is missing from that photo caption or if there’s an unnecessary the there.  This is definitely weak fashion reporting.

Cybill Shepherd: Psyched!

If I were Ms. Shepherd, I wouldn’t be too psyched about having my name misspelled on Yahoo! TV!:


Spelling 101: It’s bath time

Bath time! No, according Yahoo! Shine it’s one word:


But the writer of that headline would be wrong. Also wrong? The missing word here:


I’m just not down with this incorrect word:


or the misspelled plural of washcloth, which  is washcloths:


or the missing word here:


Proofread time!

Inglourious spelling, part trois

Nice try, but wrong. The title of the movie described on Yahoo! Movies is “Inglourious Basterds”:


It’s not the first time Yahoo! has spelled a word correctly and still gotten it wrong.

It’s a friend of Rihanna’s

A friend of mine pointed out this error on Yahoo! Shine:


Notice, I didn’t write “a friend of me.” That’s because the construction, called a double possessive, calls for the possessive after the word of, but only if the following two conditions are true: The word after of must be an animate (living) object and the word before of must be one of that object’s possessions.

Yeah, I know. Stupid. So forget you just read that. If you’re not sure if a possessive noun is correct, substitute a possessive pronoun. If it sounds right, then a possessive is probably called for. That’s what a friend of mine does.

%d bloggers like this: