Now I don’t get it. Why does reading something on yahoo.com make me want to poke my eyes out?
Maybe Katie Couric can explain the grammatical errors that appear so frequently on this page.
There’s no need to spend money on holiday gifts this year. According to yahoo.com, there’s free promotional items (also known as swag) for the taking. You can learn more in Yahoo!’s movies gift guide (or movie gift guide, seems that Yahoo! editors can’t figure out what to call it). And if you’re not into blockbuster hits, you can get home movies, though I don’t know whose home they were taken in:
Before you use a word, especially if it has more than one syllable, make sure you know what it means. If you don’t, then you may end up looking as vocabulary-challenged as this writer for Yahoo! Style:
A proprietor is an owner. It makes no sense in this context, even if the writer had used the preposition of instead of to. I haven’t a clue what words the writer should have used since I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Maybe next time the writer will consult a dictionary before using big words. Nah. That would never happen at Yahoo!.
Who’s responsible for this gaffe on Yahoo! Style?
Whose mistake is it? Who doesn’t know that who’s is a contraction of who is or who has?
The last time I checked, last September occurred in 2015. But the writer for Yahoo! Style has a different definition of last:
According to this vocabulary-challenged writer, last September occurred in 2014, which would be the last September before last September.
It’s not enough to be capitalization crazy, putting capital letters at the front of common nouns like holiday. No, that’s not enough for this Yahoo! Makers writer. She’s also idiom idiotic, with some crazy idiom stepping out, which makes no sense:
No, that’s not enough. She also happens to be hyphen happy, adding them indiscriminately in what should be seven-day lead-up. Two hyphens. That’s enough.