Here’s the first step involved in tying a bow tie. After reading this on Yahoo! Style, would you bother to read Step 2?
The writer omitted one word and then used then instead of than. That’s more mistakes than I like in a single sentence.
After reading this, it shouldn’t take you long to figure out what they’re making over at Yahoo! Makers:
They’re making mistakes and not just one or two. They’re making four in a single sentence, three of which would be flagged by a common spell-checker. The writers make more mistakes per hour than any other writers on the Web.
(In case the writer is reading this, it should be airborne, toxins, than, and purifying.)
What’s better than writing? Writing, and then editing. And maybe doing a little research. That’s what the writer for Yahoo! Style should have done:
He might have mentioned that Ms. Blanchett is an Oscar-winning actress (and not just a nominee). And he might have figured out that she looked “more like the fairy godmother” than the stepmother. Maybe.
When in comes to quality writing, the scribes at Yahoo! DIY never cease to fail:
Why would anyone make cotton candy that is guaranteed to be a failure at wowing guests? What better way to show your carelessness than adding an unnecessary word to a common idiom or confusing then with than?
When it comes to writing errors, these folks never cease to amaze.
Reading this on Yahoo! Style should have been more than enough to give me pause: Did I really want to continue reading?
In spite of that, I continued, only to discover a missing word (there should be an a between wearing and cool). Then a problem with the next sentence: I think the writer fidgeted with it a tad too much:
It seems that every day I wish that I hadn’t read something on Yahoo!, like this word that means “commonplace or ordinary”:
But I soldiered on. I wish the writer had, too, and that he tried to uncover an unnecessary word. Maybe he tried, but he doesn’t can’t find it:
If you’ve never seen than mistaken for then, or haven’t seen the compound adjective 30-second without its hyphen, then you haven’t been reading Yahoo! DIY.
What would Yahoo! DIY be without its very own misuse of it’s for its?
Somehow in that same article, this got past the eagle-eyed editors:
I think it has something to do with wearing a pattern to keep your head warm. Frankly, I think a hat would be warmer than a pattern.
Of course there are more typos, like this one below:
Call me old-fashioned, but I appreciate the well-placed hyphen and the beauty of a real dash (like this: —) and not a puny hyphen:
Also, I think pronouns (like them) should refer to a noun that’s actually present in the same sentence. Or paragraph. Or article.