So, you’re reading an article on Yahoo! Shine, thinking that it’s a reliable source of information, and then you stumble on a word that makes you question the writer’s credibility:
It’s a breach of trust.
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
So, you’re reading an article on Yahoo! Shine, thinking that it’s a reliable source of information, and then you stumble on a word that makes you question the writer’s credibility:
It’s a breach of trust.
Are Yahoo! staffers obsessed with anatomy — especially that part of the human anatomy below the waist? It’s probably a breach of etiquette for me to point out that the “security breech” on the Yahoo! front page has something to do with the buttocks. Perhaps it’s a reference to undergarments used for “security,” if you get my drift:
Whether it’s using a certain slang word for part of the male anatomy or making pubic comments, the anatomical references might be the keyboard equivalent of a Freudian slip.
Or, they might just be a manifestation of the writers’ ignorance of the English language.