Yahoo renamed its Style site to Lifestyle. That might be an improvement. Unfortunately, the Internet giant didn’t improve on the quality of its writing and editing. Are you fazed by this homophonic horror?
Apparently this hasn’t fazed the editorial team at Yahoo.
I’ve seen so many homophonic horrors on Yahoo!, that one more (from Yahoo! Parenting) doesn’t faze me in the least:
Considering the number of times the writers and editors at Yahoo! make this mistake, it really shouldn’t faze me to see it again on Yahoo! Style:
I’ve seen so many homophonic errors on Yahoo! that this one from Yahoo! News doesn’t faze me:
Is the writer for Yahoo! Parenting going through a phase? She doesn’t seem fazed by this homophonic horror:
When I read this on Yahoo! Celebrity, I was not at all fazed by the writer’s ignorance of the homophones phase and faze:
Not much fazes me when I’m reading Yahoo! Celebrity. I generally remain unfazed by the writers’ many mistakes, even this one:
I’ve seen so many ridiculous homophonic errors on Yahoo!, that another one leaves me entirely unfazed. I’m not even shocked that the writer for Yahoo! Travel decided that the prefix UN required a hyphen:
What does it take to “phase” a bison? I have no idea, but I was fazed by this word usage by a “journalist” at Yahoo! News:
When it comes to homophonic errors, I go through phases sometimes where it’s every day that I discover them on Yahoo!. Today it was on Yahoo! omg!:
I’ll never understand how a writer can confuse faze with phase or everyday (which means ordinary) with every day (which means each day).
If you’re prone to mixing up homophones, you should have someone who’s knowledgeable about language proofread your writing:
Look for someone who knows the difference between whose (a possessive pronoun) and who’s (a contraction of who is or who has). I don’t recommend the person who wrote this article.
Terribly Write 